ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Comparing surgical and conservative treatment approaches for perianal abscess in patients with hematologic malignancies: a comprehensive analysis.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perianal Sonographic Approach to Fistula-in-Ano and Perianal Abscesses: A Pictorial Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Age-stratified management of pediatric perianal abscesses: a proposed framework integrating the "Developmental Healing Axis".Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perianal abscess (PA) is a complication of infection in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, the simultaneous occurrence of neutropenia and increased susceptibility to bleeding pose significant challenges for surgical intervention in perianal abscesses. In this retrospective study, we sought to evaluate and compare the efficacy of pharmacological therapy and surgical intervention in the management of PA in patients with hematologic malignancies, bwtween 2015 and 2022 at the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. In total, 53 patients were enrolled in this study, including 19 cases with surgical intervention, and 34 cases with conservative treatment. During the 60-day follow-up period, a significant improvement of symptoms or complete resolution was observed in 48 patients (90.5%). But the cure rates between the two groups showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). Additionally, the surgical group demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate compared to the conservative group, while there was no statistically significant disparity in recurrence rates (10.4% vs. 23.6%, p > 0.05). Patients with conservative treatment showed significantly shorter recovery time compared to patients with surgical treatment (p = 0.048). In conclusion, both conservative and surgical management approaches were safe and effective in relieving symptoms, but surgical intervention significantly decreased the recurrence rate. Therefore, consideration of surgical intervention is warranted for patients with recurrent perianal infections after conservative treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.