Trial reportNature medicine2025
Sacituzumab tirumotecan in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05347134 (A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Clinical Trial of SKB264 for Injection Versus Investigator Selected Regimens in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer Who Have Failed Second-line or Above Prior Standard of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Clinical Trial of SKB264 for Injection Versus Investigator Selected Regimens in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer Who Have Failed Second-line or Above Prior Standard of Care
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assessment of Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) expression and its clinical significance in breast cancer: a multi-level analysis of protein and gene expression.BMC medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Major Advances in Breast Cancer Therapeutics in 2025: Synthesis of Conference and Published Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of subsequent-line therapies for advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Oncology reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Sacituzumab tirumotecan in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a detailed safety analysis of the randomized OptiTROP-Breast01 study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Trial
- Phase II Clinical Study of Adebrelimab and Bevacizumab Combined With Cisplatin/Carboplatin in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer With Brain Metastases (ABC Study).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Sacituzumab tirumotecan versus docetaxel for previously treatedBMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Trial
- TROP2 expression in gastric and GEJ adenocarcinomas: associations with clinicopathological features, biomarkers, and treatment outcomes.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: redefining targeted therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Next-generation antibody-based therapeutics in cancer: antibody-drug conjugates bispecific antibodies across hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Metastasis of triple negative breast cancer is regulated by a targetable miR-342-E2F network.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Current and future therapies for triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical Advances in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Overview of Full-Course Disease Management.Cancer innovation · 2026Review
- TroFuse-011 study design: sacituzumab tirumotecan with or without pembrolizumab for advanced triple-negative breast cancer with PD-L1 CPS <10.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-activated RuORSC advances · 2026Article
- Turmoil and breakthroughs: Highlights and growing pains in breast cancer therapy 2025Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: from mechanism to revolutionizing clinical practice.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: Progress and future directions.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Review
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Pharmacotherapeutic Properties and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Targeted Therapies for Each Subtype of Breast Cancer.MedComm · 2026Review
- Phase II trial of anlotinib-chemotherapy combination in pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: therapeutic efficacy and proteomic biomarker profiling.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy remains a standard treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but is associated with limited survival. Although some targeted antibody-drug conjugates have demonstrated clinical benefits and are considered standard therapy, persistent unmet medical needs remain due to varying accessibility. The OptiTROP-Breast01 phase 3 trial assessed sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) versus chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who had received two or more prior therapies, including at least one for metastatic disease. Patients were randomized to sac-TMT (n = 130) or chemotherapy (n = 133). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was met based on the protocol-specified interim analysis. At final analysis, the median PFS by BICR was 6.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5-8.0) months with sac-TMT and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7-2.7) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR), 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24-0.44; P < 0.00001). Concurrently, at the protocol-specified interim analysis for overall survival (OS), the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 11.2 months to not estimable (NE)) with sac-TMT and 9.4 (95% CI, 8.5-11.7) months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.78; P = 0.0005). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 45.4% with sac-TMT and 12.0% with chemotherapy. The median duration of response was 7.1 (95% CI, 5.6-NE) months with sac-TMT and 3.0 (95% CI, 2.5-NE) months with chemotherapy. The most common treatment-related adverse event with sac-TMT was hematologic toxicity. Sac-TMT demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS compared to chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile. The study findings support sac-TMT as an additional effective treatment option for pretreated metastatic TNBC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05347134 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40217078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.