Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40217078›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2025

Sacituzumab tirumotecan in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Yongmei Yin, Ying Fan, Quchang Ouyang, Lihua Song, Xiaojia Wang, Wei Li, Man Li, Xi Yan, Shusen Wang, Tao Sun and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05347134 (A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Clinical Trial of SKB264 for Injection Versus Investigator Selected Regimens in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer Who Have Failed Second-line or Above Prior Standard of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05347134 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Clinical Trial of SKB264 for Injection Versus Investigator Selected Regimens in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced, Recurrent or Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer Who Have Failed Second-line or Above Prior Standard of Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorSichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Ran2022 to 2027Enrolled254ConditionsTriple Negative Breast CancerArmsSKB264
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Ultrasound-activated RuORSC advances · 2026
    Article
  15. Turmoil and breakthroughs: Highlights and growing pains in breast cancer therapy 2025Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Yongmei Yin *Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3335-369X
Ying Fan *National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Quchang Ouyang *Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China.
Lihua SongShandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, China.
Xiaojia WangZhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-0842
Wei LiThe First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Man LiThe Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Xi YanWest China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Shusen WangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0139-5780
Tao SunCancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Yuee TengThe First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xianjun TangChongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Zhongsheng TongTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhengkui SunJiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China.
Junyou GeSichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Xiaoping JinSichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Yina DiaoSichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Gesha LiuSichuan Kelun-Biotech Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chengdu, China.
Binghe XuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. xubinghe@medmail.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-337X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy remains a standard treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) but is associated with limited survival. Although some targeted antibody-drug conjugates have demonstrated clinical benefits and are considered standard therapy, persistent unmet medical needs remain due to varying accessibility. The OptiTROP-Breast01 phase 3 trial assessed sacituzumab tirumotecan (sac-TMT) versus chemotherapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who had received two or more prior therapies, including at least one for metastatic disease. Patients were randomized to sac-TMT (n = 130) or chemotherapy (n = 133). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) was met based on the protocol-specified interim analysis. At final analysis, the median PFS by BICR was 6.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5-8.0) months with sac-TMT and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7-2.7) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR), 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24-0.44; P < 0.00001). Concurrently, at the protocol-specified interim analysis for overall survival (OS), the median OS was not reached (95% CI, 11.2 months to not estimable (NE)) with sac-TMT and 9.4 (95% CI, 8.5-11.7) months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.78; P = 0.0005). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 45.4% with sac-TMT and 12.0% with chemotherapy. The median duration of response was 7.1 (95% CI, 5.6-NE) months with sac-TMT and 3.0 (95% CI, 2.5-NE) months with chemotherapy. The most common treatment-related adverse event with sac-TMT was hematologic toxicity. Sac-TMT demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS compared to chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile. The study findings support sac-TMT as an additional effective treatment option for pretreated metastatic TNBC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05347134 .

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCamptothecinImmunoconjugatesTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCamptothecinImmunoconjugatessacituzumab govitecan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.