ReviewBritish dental journal2025
Endodontic access cavity preparation: challenges and recent advancements.
Review in British dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of haptic virtual reality simulation training before clinical endodontic practice on student performance and perception.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Impedance-Guided Localisation of Pulp Chambers and Canal Orifices in Calcified Root Canal Systems: Biological Foundations and Conceptual Application.International endodontic journal · 2026Review
- How does a Truss conservative endodontic access cavity impact the degree of intra-canal disinfection and postoperative pain?Evidence-based dentistry · 2026Article
- Effect of preendodontic build-up on irrigant penetration in extracted single-rooted premolars: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Influence of access cavity design on instrumentation efficiency in 3D-printed replicas of mandibular incisors with Vertucci Type III canals.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative Assessment of Observed Dentinal Defects Following Root Canal Preparation With TruNatomy, ProTaper Next, and Dia-X Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Guided Endodontics-Potential and Limitations.Australian dental journal · 2025Review
- CBCT based three dimensional odontometric mapping of maxillary anterior teeth in an Indian cohort to guide precision endodontic access cavity preparation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing root canal treatment: A review of minimally invasive endodontics.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Odontogenic pain from various dental issues significantly impacts quality of life, necessitating effective treatment during emergency dental care. Endodontic access cavity preparation is essential for alleviating symptoms and preventing further infection. This procedure aims to achieve symptom relief while conserving as much tooth structure as possible. This paper discusses the importance of proper endodontic access, emphasising the balance between adequate disinfection and preserving tooth integrity. It also identifies challenges in endodontic access cavity preparation. This study reviews existing literature on endodontic access, examining different approaches to access cavity preparation and the tools and techniques used. Factors affecting access difficulty, including tooth anatomy, patient-related challenges and operator skills, are evaluated, alongside advancements in imaging and instrumentation. The review shows conservative techniques, like minimally invasive access cavities, which helps to preserve tooth structure but requires advanced skills and may risk incomplete disinfection. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) aids in complex cases, improving canal location accuracy. Operator skills and proper equipment are key to success. Traditional cavities offer better access but can weaken the tooth, while conservative approaches maintain structure but demand more expertise. Imaging tools, including CBCT, are beneficial for complex anatomy but can be costly. To conclude, effective endodontic access cavity preparation requires a balanced approach tailored to each case. While conservative methods offer advantages in preserving tooth structure, their success depends on operator expertise and equipment. Incorporating imaging advancements like CBCT can enhance access success, especially in anatomically complex cases, but careful assessment of case complexity remains crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.