ArticleScientific reports2025
CMTNet: a hybrid CNN-transformer network for UAV-based hyperspectral crop classification in precision agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Harnessing large vision and language models in agriculture: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Pooled it
- VIS-NIR-SWIR Proximal Spectroradiometry Coupled with Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Ornamental Plant Identification and Classification.ACS omega · 2026Article
- GMFNet: A GADF-Mamba Fusion Network for Soybean Seed Hyperspectral Classification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multi-dimensional pyramid strategy for limited sample classification of hyperspectral cropland imagery.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A paradigm-level evaluation of deep learning architectures for plant pest and disease recognition under data-scarce field conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Multiscale CNN-state space model with feature fusion for crop disease detection from UAV imagery.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging acquired from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) offers detailed spectral and spatial data that holds transformative potential for precision agriculture applications, such as crop classification, health monitoring, and yield estimation. However, traditional methods struggle to effectively capture both local and global features, particularly in complex agricultural environments with diverse crop types, varying growth stages, and imbalanced data distributions. To address these challenges, we propose CMTNet, an innovative deep learning framework that integrates convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformers for hyperspectral crop classification. The model combines a spectral-spatial feature extraction module to capture shallow features, a dual-branch architecture that extracts both local and global features simultaneously, and a multi-output constraint module to enhance classification accuracy through cross-constraints among multiple feature levels. Extensive experiments were conducted on three UAV-acquired datasets: WHU-Hi-LongKou, WHU-Hi-HanChuan, and WHU-Hi-HongHu. The experimental results demonstrate that CMTNet achieved overall accuracy (OA) values of 99.58%, 97.29%, and 98.31% on these three datasets, surpassing the current state-of-the-art method (CTMixer) by 0.19% (LongKou), 1.75% (HanChuan), and 2.52% (HongHu) in OA values, respectively. These findings indicate its superior potential for UAV-based agricultural monitoring in complex environments. These results advance the precision and reliability of hyperspectral crop classification, offering a valuable solution for precision agriculture challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.