ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence orchestration for text-based ultrasonic simulation via self-review by multi-large language model agents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Widely used ultrasonic simulation systems often rely on complex graphical user interfaces (GUIs) or scripting, resulting in substantial time investments and reduced accessibility for new users. In this study, we propose a novel text-based simulation control architecture, which leverages a large language model (LLM) and the ground artificial intelligence (AI) approach to streamline the control of ultrasonic simulation systems. By modularizing the functionalities of the SimNDT program into discrete functions and enabling natural language-based command interpretation, the proposed method reduces the average simulation configuration time by approximately 75%. To further mitigate task failures in scenario generation using the LLM, we introduce the ground AI approach, which employs self-review mechanisms and multi-agent collaboration to improve task completion rates. In particular, when vectorized output lengths deviate from the standard, we regenerate outputs using multiple LLM agents, reducing the scenario generation error rate from 23.89 to 1.48% and enhancing reliability significantly. These advancements underscore the potential of AI-driven methods in reducing operational costs and enhancing reliability in simulation frameworks. By integrating text-based control and Ground AI mechanisms, the proposed approach provides an efficient and scalable alternative to traditional GUI-based control methods, particularly in time-sensitive applications such as digital twin systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.