ArticleNature nanotechnology2025
From small batteries to big claims.
Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stereochemical origin of potential hysteresis in lithium metal batteries with lithium-rich cation-disordered rocksalt positive electrodes.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Multi-element nanoscale doping of iron-rich sodium layered oxides enables ampere-hour-level Na-ion batteries.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Where is my graphene battery?Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Rigid polyanion architectures enable multiple ion-transport pathways and nanocluster dynamics in composite polymer battery electrolytes.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Nanoengineered doping overcomes sintering and grain-boundary limitations in all-solid-state lithium batteries with garnet electrolytes.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Coherent twins for manufacturing thick lithium-rich battery positive electrodes.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Interfacial polarity modulation of positive electrode active materials for high-potential lithium metal batteries.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Nanoengineering of non-aqueous liquid electrolyte solutions for future lithium metal batteries.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Review
- Optically-Coupled X-Ray Computed Laminography System for High-Speed Inspection of Lithium-Ion Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Unravelling electro-chemo-mechanical processes in graphite/silicon composites for designing nanoporous and microstructured battery electrodes.Nature nanotechnology · 2025Article
- A nanoengineered lithium-hosting carbon/zinc oxide composite electrode material for efficient non-aqueous lithium metal batteries.Nature nanotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A frequently undervalued aspect of lithium-ion battery performance reporting is the specification of the format and area of the tested cells. However, these parameters provide crucial insights into the quality of the electrodes used for cell assembly and the reliability of the data obtained from the investigated systems. Here we focus on the aspects of process standardization and industry collaboration necessary for translating nanoscale electrochemical processes to Ah-scale cells. We examine the role of cell area and format in promoting comparability and standardization in battery research studies with technology readiness levels of 4 or higher. In addition, we discuss the limitations, challenges and expectations associated with measuring and evaluating battery performance exclusively in small cell formats.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.