ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-based classification of lymphedema and other lower limb edema diseases using clinical images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Surgery in Lymphedema: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Clinical Translation, and Evidence Gaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Lymphedema imaging and AI: A review of diagnostic modalities, biomarkers, and clinical integration.Biomedical journal · 2026Review
- AI-Empowered Mechanomedicine for Cancer-Related Lymphedema.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphedema is a chronic condition characterized by lymphatic fluid accumulation, primarily affecting the limbs. Its diagnosis is challenging due to symptom overlap with conditions like chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and systemic diseases, often leading to diagnostic delays that can extend up to ten years. These delays negatively impact patient outcomes and burden healthcare systems. Conventional diagnostic methods rely heavily on clinical expertise, which may fail to distinguish subtle variations between these conditions. This study investigates the application of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically deep learning, to improve diagnostic accuracy for lower limb edema. A dataset of 1622 clinical images was used to train sixteen convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer-based models, including EfficientNetV2, which achieved the highest accuracy of 78.6%. Grad-CAM analyses enhanced model interpretability, highlighting clinically relevant features such as swelling and hyperpigmentation. The AI system consistently outperformed human evaluators, whose diagnostic accuracy plateaued at 62.7%. The findings underscore the transformative potential of AI as a diagnostic tool, particularly in distinguishing conditions with overlapping clinical presentations. By integrating AI with clinical workflows, healthcare systems can reduce diagnostic delays, enhance accuracy, and alleviate the burden on medical professionals. While promising, the study acknowledges limitations, such as dataset diversity and the controlled evaluation environment, which necessitate further validation in real-world settings. This research highlights the potential of AI-driven diagnostics to revolutionize lymphedema care, bridging gaps in conventional methods and supporting healthcare professionals in delivering more precise and timely interventions. Future work should focus on external validation and hybrid systems integrating AI and clinical expertise for comprehensive diagnostic solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.