ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel reindeer cyclone optimization algorithm (RCOA).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces the Reindeer Cyclone Optimization Algorithm (RCOA), a novel metaheuristic optimization technique inspired by the survival behavior of reindeer during predator attacks in formation cyclonic storms. RCOA imitates the defense-centric cooperative behavior of reindeer, where individuals cluster together to withstand external threats. This behavior is analogous to the optimization process where exploration (global search for exploring new areas) and exploitation (local refinement to copy or learn from neighbor in cyclonic form) are carefully balanced. The algorithm has been extensively evaluated against 14 unimodal and multimodal benchmark functions and 4 real-world complex optimization problems. RCOA demonstrates a moderate improvement of around 5-12% over other algorithms such as PSO, DE, COA and GSA on unimodal functions. On multimodal functions, RCOA shows more competitive performance, especially in terms of stability, with an improvement of around 10-15% in accuracy and consistency compared to WDO and PSO. The algorithm is evaluated using the CEC'17 benchmark suite with 50 dimensions and compared against different well-established optimization algorithms, including WOA, PSO, GSA, and DE. Experimental results demonstrate that RCOA outperforms existing methods on multiple test functions by achieving superior convergence speed and solution accuracy. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test confirms the statistical significance of RCOA's performance, indicating its robustness and reliability in handling diverse optimization landscapes. The findings suggest that RCOA is a competitive optimization method suitable for a wide range of real-world applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.