Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40216899›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimization of nano-finned enclosure-shaped latent heat thermal energy storage units using CFD, RSM, and enhanced hill climbing algorithm.

Tao Hai, Ihab Omar, As'ad Alizadeh, Neeraj Varshney, Saurav Dixit, Abbas J Sultan, Ali E Anqi, Sanjay Bhatnagar, Husam Rajab, Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tao HaiArtificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, P.O.Box: 346, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Ihab OmarAir Conditioning Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Warith Al-Anbiyaa University, 56001, Karbala, Iraq.
As'ad AlizadehDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Cihan University-Erbil, Erbil, Iraq. asad.alizadeh2010@gmail.com.
Neeraj VarshneyDepartment of Computer Engineering and Applications, Institute of Engineering and Technology, GLA University, Mathura, U.P., 281406, India.
Saurav DixitCentre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140417, India.
Abbas J SultanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology-Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ali E AnqiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Sanjay BhatnagarChitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, 174103, India.
Husam RajabCollege of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Najran University, King Abdulaziz Road, P.O Box 1988, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Narinderjit Singh Sawaran SinghFaculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, 71800, Nilai, Malaysia.

Funding

Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University RGP2/528/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal energy storage plays a critical role in improving energy efficiency and sustainability, particularly in solar energy systems, industrial waste heat recovery, and building temperature regulation. However, traditional latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) systems face significant challenges due to the low thermal conductivity of phase change materials (PCMs), leading to prolonged charging/discharging times and reduced efficiency. To address these limitations, this study presents a framework for optimizing nano-finned enclosure-shaped LHTES units that incorporate nano-enhanced phase change materials (NePCMs) and fins. The research employs a novel hybrid approach that integrates computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, response surface methodology (RSM), and an enhanced hill climbing (EHC) optimization technique to explore the complex interplay between fin geometry and nanomaterial characteristics. The influence of key design variables-including three fin geometry parameters (number, length, volume), nanomaterial concentration, and eight nanomaterials (metal, oxide, and carbon-based)-is analyzed to optimize phase change time and total stored energy. Results demonstrate that reduced sixth-degree and reduced quartic polynomial models, developed through RSM, provide high accuracy in predicting total stored energy and melting time, respectively. While the incorporation of nanomaterials generally reduces total stored energy due to their lower latent heat, carbon-based nanomaterials (GNPs, MWCNTs) offer an optimal trade-off, achieving faster melting times with minimal energy storage loss. Among the studied parameters, fin volume fraction plays a more dominant role in determining energy storage capacity compared to nanomaterial volume fraction. The optimal design configuration varies based on the priority assigned to melting time or stored energy. In a melting-time-focused scenario, the optimized unit achieves 63.03 kJ of stored energy with a melting time of 91.76 s. When prioritizing energy storage, the stored energy increases to 66.15 kJ, but the melting time extends to 222.3 s. A balanced optimization scenario yields 64.67 kJ of stored energy and a melting time of 137.4 s. These findings provide valuable insights into the design and optimization of advanced LHTES units for enhanced thermal energy management.

Indexed as

Computational fluid dynamicsEnhanced hill climbingFinned LHTES systemLatent heat thermal energy storageNano-enhanced phase change materialsResponse surface methodology

Identifiers

PMID40216899
PMCPMC11992072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.