ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction of a nomogram model based on multiple factors to differentiate cryptococcal meningitis from tuberculous meningitis in HIV-Infected patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel diagnostic strategy of differential diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis and non-tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective observational cohort study.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate a nomogram model for differentiating cryptococcal meningitis (CM) from tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in HIV-infected patients, given the diagnostic challenges due to shared clinical manifestations and limitations of existing methods. A retrospective analysis extracted 207 HIV cases (112 CM, 95 TBM). Candidate predictor variables covering general information, blood biochemical, and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) examination indicators were collected. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and ten-fold cross-validation identified key predictors, which were used to construct and validate the nomogram model. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to interpret the characteristics of the model's predictor variables. Five predictors (extracranial tuberculosis, extracranial fungi, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, albumin, and CSF pressure) were included in the final nomogram. The model achieved AUC of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.758-0.902) in the training set and 0.811 (95% CI: 0.719-0.904) in the testing set, with good calibration and clinical validity shown by calibration curves and DCA. The developed nomogram model effectively distinguishes CM from TBM in HIV-infected patients. It aids clinicians in diagnosis decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.