Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40216888›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2025

The diversity of CD8

Lorenzo Galluzzi, Kellie N Smith, Adrian Liston, Abhishek D Garg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. γδ T cells and cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Menaquinone-4 protects CD8Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Renaissance of antiviral CD8Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CD8Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  18. Melanosomes support immune evasion in melanoma.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2026
    Article
  19. Adoptive T-cell therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorenzo GalluzziCancer Signalling and Microenvironment Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. deadoc80@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2257-8500
Kellie N SmithBloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6295-8930
Adrian ListonDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-4085
Abhishek D GargLaboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. abhishek.garg@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-9922

Funding

Immunogenomic determinants of response and resistance to neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 in resectable NSCLCR37CA251447 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Kellie Nicole Smith · 2021 to 2026
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA251447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD8

Indexed as

CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesNeoplasmsVirus DiseasesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.