ArticleScientific reports2025
Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to dementia and cognitive impairment among medical specialists with expertise unrelated to dementia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A literature review of dementia literacy in China: From awareness to action as a driver of the 2024-2030 National Dementia Action Plan.General psychiatry · 2026Review
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of medical staff toward behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in medical institutions in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) on dementia and cognitive impairment among medical specialists with expertise unrelated to dementia. This study enrolled medical specialists with expertise unrelated to dementia from 318 medical institutions in China, between March and April 2023. A self-designed questionnaire was used for data collection and KAP assessment. A total of 1288 valid questionnaires were collected, 62.58% from female participants. The KAP scores were 11.02 ± 2.11 (range: 0-13), 22.16 ± 3.40 (range: 0-24), and 29.48 ± 6.92 (range: 0-32), respectively. The structural equation model showed that knowledge was positively associated with attitude (path coefficient = 0.503, P < 0.001), while both knowledge (path coefficient = 0.713, P < 0.001) and attitude (path coefficient = 0.797, P < 0.001) were positively associated with practice. Type of institution (path coefficient = 0.184, P = 0.035) and professional title (path coefficient = 0.133, P = 0.026) were positively associated with knowledge score. The mediation analysis revealed the significant total effects for professional title on knowledge, knowledge and professional title on attitude, and knowledge, attitude, and education on practice. Medical specialists in China with expertise unrelated to dementia might have good knowledge, a positive attitude, and proactive practice toward dementia and cognitive impairment. Tailored educational interventions should be specifically designed for individuals with lower professional titles and those working outside public tertiary hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.