Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40216869›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in patients aged 46 years and above.

Masayuki Ouchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masayuki OuchiMasayuki Ouchi Eye Clinic, 9-1 Nishikujo Ohkuni-cho, Minami-ku, Kyoto, 601-8449, Japan. mouchi@skyblue.ocn.ne.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the backgrounds, preoperative correction methods, refractive targets, and outcomes of patients aged 46-57 years who underwent implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery. A retrospective review of 60 eyes from 31 patients was conducted, focusing on preoperative correction methods, refractive status, and both targeted and achieved refractive outcomes. Of these, 61.3% of patients were engaged in desk-bound occupations. Although 25.8% of patients exhibited more than 1 diopter (D) of myopic error in at least one eye during routine preoperative correction and no patients had used presbyopic glasses preoperatively, 77.4% of patients hoped to achieve emmetropia in both eyes postoperatively. Postoperative uncorrected distance and near visual acuities (VA) averaged logMAR - 0.07 ± 0.17 and logMAR 0.10 ± 0.45, respectively. The mean postoperative residual refraction was - 0.62 ± 0.66 D, with all eyes except one achieving postoperative refraction within ± 0.5 D of the target. Although some patients reported occasional use of near glasses postoperatively, satisfaction remained high, with 96.8% of patients rating their satisfaction in the top two levels of a 5-point scale. No adverse events were observed. These findings suggest that ICL surgery is a safe and predictable option for patients in this age group, particularly with appropriate preoperative counseling.

Indexed as

Lens Implantation, IntraocularMyopiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative PeriodRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID40216869
PMCPMC11992223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.