ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in unresected colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic nomogram for colorectal cancer liver metastasis treated with tumor resection and chemotherapy based on SEER database.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to develop nomograms for predicting overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did not receive primary site surgery but underwent chemotherapy. We analyzed data from 3,050 patients treated with chemotherapy without primary site surgery from 2010 to 2015, sourced from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The data were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Initial variable selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Two nomograms were subsequently constructed based on these factors. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test. We identified nine significant predictors of OS and CSS: age, marital status, primary site, grade, histology, T stage, M stage, tumor size, and CEA levels. The models for OS and CSS exhibited excellent predictability, with time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) exceeding 0.7. Calibration curves confirmed the accuracy of these predictions in the training and validation sets. Additionally, decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that our models provide greater clinical benefit than traditional TNM staging. Notably, survival outcomes varied significantly across risk categories, affirming the models' effective discrimination. For CRC patients who did not receive primary site surgery but underwent chemotherapy, this validated nomogram enables precision prognostication fundamentally shifting the paradigm from population-level TNM estimates to individualized risk-adaptive management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.