ArticleScientific reports2025
Synergistic impact of osseointegration and multifunctionality on functionally graded ceramic composites for bone healing applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upcycling waste iron into high-performance FeScientific reports · 2026Article
- Boosting tribo-mechanical, thermal expansion and electrical performance of waste polytetrafluoroethylene using high-strength carbide ceramics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sustainable production of intermetallic nanocomposites from aluminum and iron scarp, with excellent tribo-mechanical and thermal properties for industrial applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a functionally graded composite (FGC) sample was fabricated by layering five layers of hydroxyapatite (HA), silicon carbide (SiC), and copper oxide (CuO) nanoparticles. The osseointegration ability of all prepared FGC layers was assessed using simulated body fluid (SBF), and an investigation was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The physical, mechanical, electrical, and dielectric properties were evaluated before and after immersion in the SBF solution. Additionally, the antibacterial efficacy and biocompatibility of these layers were examined. Sintered layers exhibit porosity values ranging from 5 to 10%, similar to compact bone, which is essential for effective osseointegration. SEM images showed good bioactive behavior across all FGC layers. The measured ultimate strength of the samples was 77.30, 81.54, 85.80, 93.29, and 102.82 MPa due to the successive increase in SiC and CuO content of the samples. This makes it mainly identical to cortical bone, sparing the bone from a stress-shielded effect. Soaking the produced layers with SBF did not impact their mechanical properties, indicating that their biological activity and mechanical properties are compatible. However, their electrical properties altered somewhat after soaking in SBF. Notably, the sample with the highest SiC and CuO content exhibited a 75% reduction in weight loss after applying a load of 10 N. Also, CuO inclusion in the studied layers led to a significant inhibition in S. aureus and E. coli bacterial growth up to 23 and 16 mm, respectively, without a noticeable cytotoxic effect. Based on these findings, the developed FGC sample and its layers are appropriate for bone healing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.