ArticleScientific reports2025
Nationwide study on clinical impact of early tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors following first intestinal resection in biologics-naïve Crohn's disease patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Crohn's disease (CD) patients who have undergone surgery, postoperative recurrence remains a challenge, and there is a lack of investigation into the impact of early anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy following surgery on clinical outcomes compared to late use of anti-TNF agents. Utilizing the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study comprising 481 CD patients who underwent their first intestinal resection and were naïve to preoperative biological therapy from 2010 to 2018. Patients initiating anti-TNF agents early (within one year post-surgery) were compared to those starting later for prognosis. Clinical outcomes, including biologics switching and surgical recurrence, were assessed. The late start group (n = 290) exhibited a higher surgical recurrence rate (27.9% vs. 18.3%, p-value = 0.021), while biologics switching rates did not significantly differ (8.3% vs. 12.6%, p-value = 0.167) compared to the early start group (n = 191). Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant differences in the risk of biologics switching (p-value = 0.319) or surgical recurrence (p-value = 0.380) between the early and late start groups. This study investigated the potential role of early anti-TNF therapy after first intestinal resection in biologics-naïve CD patients compared to late initiation. Further refined prospective research is warranted to validate these comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.