ArticleScientific reports2025
Chitosan hydrogels loaded with Cu
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chitosan-Based Hydrogels in Vascular Tissue Engineering Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Thermo-Sensitive Polymeric Networks for Next-Generation Wound Management: A Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Ionic-Bionic Interfaces: Advancing Iontronic Strategies for Bioelectronic Sensing and Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Advanced Hydrogel Functionalization Strategies for Burn-Related Wound Treatment.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- Biocompatible Stimuli-Sensitive Natural Hydrogels: Recent Advances in Biomedical Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pharmacological and Biological Efficacy of Chitosan-Based Materials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Tellurium-Doped Silanised Bioactive Glass-Chitosan Hydrogels: A Dual Action for Antimicrobial and Osteoconductive Platforms.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, burns pose a significant health concern, impairing the skin's normal function and elevating the risk of bacterial infection. Traditional burn dressings often fail to deliver the anticipated therapeutic benefits. Hence, there is an urgent need to develop an ideal wound dressing that exhibits satisfactory antibacterial properties, biocompatibility, and the ability to expedite burn wound healing. Here, we prepared chitosan-based hydrogel (CS/GP), and then loaded copper-tin -sulfur (Cu
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.