ArticleBDJ open2025
Influence of the rotation angles on the mechanical behavior of the one reci instrument.
Article in BDJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe reciprocity is a complex endodontic kinematic involving many parameters. The most important of these is undoubtedly the selection of clockwise and counterclockwise rotation angles. In this context, the aim of this study was to determine the influence of clockwise and counterclockwise rotation angles on the mechanical properties of 25/0.06 One Reci reciprocity instruments.
methodFor this purpose, 5 groups of 10 25/0.06 One Reci instruments were used and each group was associated with a pair of counterclockwise/clockwise rotation angles (CCW/CW). In order to study only one variable at a time, one of the two angles was fixed and the second was increased or decreased. The distribution of angles was as follows: Group 1: 170°/60°; Group 2: 150°/60°; Group 3: 170°/30°; Group 4: 170°/90°; Group 5: 210°/60°. Thanks to a load/unload endodontic protocol carried out on a tensile bench, we quantified for each tested pair of angles (i) the cutting efficiency, (ii) the screwing effect and (iii) the generated torque.
resultsIncreasing or decreasing one of the two rotation angles influences the mechanical behavior of the instruments, as does the resulting range. Therefore, our results showed a direct influence of rotation angles on the mechanical behavior of endodontic instruments.
conclusionThis study analyzes the influence of clockwise and counterclockwise rotation angles on the mechanical properties of 25/0.06 One Reci reciprocity instruments. The results of this work tend to demonstrate a direct influence of rotation angles on the mechanical behavior of 25/0.06 One Reci instruments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.