ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
3D reconstruction in endonasal pituitary surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Virtual and Augmented Reality in Transsphenoidal Surgical Approaches to the Sellar and Parasellar Area-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEndoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors is hindered by limited visibility and maneuverability due to the narrow nasal corridor, increasing the risk of complications. To address these challenges, we present a pipeline for 3D reconstruction of the sellar anatomy from monocular endoscopic videos to enhance intraoperative visualization and navigation.
methodsData were collected through a user study with trainee surgeons, and the procedure was conducted on 3D printed, anatomically correct phantom devices. To overcome limitations posed by the uniform, textureless surfaces of these devices, learned feature detectors and matchers were leveraged to extract meaningful information from the images. The matched features were reconstructed using COLMAP, and the resulting surfaces were evaluated using the iterative closest point algorithm against the CAD ground-truth surface of the printed phantoms.
resultsMost methods resulted in accurate reconstructions with moderate variability in cases with high blur or occlusions. Average RMSE values of 0.33 mm and 0.41 mm, for the two best methods, Dense Kernelized Feature Matching and SuperPoint with LightGlue, respectively, were obtained in the surface registrations across all test sequences, with a significantly higher computation time for Dense Kernelized Feature Matching.
conclusionThe proposed pipeline was able to accurately reconstruct anatomically correct 3D models of the phantom devices, showing potential for the use of learned feature detectors and matchers in real time for AR-guided navigation in pituitary surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.