ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
SwinCVS: a unified approach to classifying critical view of safety structures in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Automated Recognition of Hepatocystic Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Current Evidence, Clinical Readiness, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The digital scalpel: navigating the future of surgical innovation.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Enhancing critical view of safety recognition using vision foundation models and state-space temporal modeling.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- TempoSafe-CVS: A Temporal Multi-scale Deep Learning Framework for Automated Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- The era of autonomous surgical robotics in thoracic surgery: is it coming?International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in the UK. Despite its safety, the volume of operations leads to a notable number of complications, with surgical errors often mitigated by the critical view of safety (CVS) technique. However, reliably achieving CVS intraoperatively can be challenging. Current state-of-the-art models for automated CVS evaluation rely on complex, multistage training and semantic segmentation masks, restricting their adaptability and limiting further performance improvements.
methodsWe propose SwinCVS, a spatiotemporal architecture designed for end-to-end training. SwinCVS combines the SwinV2 image encoder with an LSTM for robust CVS classification. We evaluated three different backbones-SwinV2, VMamba, and ResNet50-to assess their ability to encode surgical images. SwinCVS model was evaluated with the end-to-end variant, and with the pretrained variant with performance statistically compared with the current state-of-the-art, SV2LSTG on Endoscapes dataset.
resultsSwinV2 demonstrated as the best encoder achieving +2.07% and +17.72% mAP over VMamba and ResNet50, respectively. SwinCVS trained end-to-end achieves 64.59% mAP and performs on par with SV2LSTG (64.68% mAP, p=0.470), while its pretrained variant achieves 67.45% mAP showing a significant improvement over the current SOTA.
conclusionOur proposed solution offers a promising approach for CVS classification, outperforming existing methods and eliminating the need for semantic segmentation masks. Its design supports robust feature extraction and allows for future enhancements through additional tasks that force clinically relevant priors. The results highlight that attention-based architectures like SwinV2 are well suited for surgical image encoding, offering a practical approach for improving automated systems in laparoscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.