Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40216687›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Characterizing the effects of emotional distraction on sustained attention and subsequent memory: A novel emotional gradual onset continuous performance task.

Michael Esterman, Sam Agnoli, Travis C Evans, Audreyana Jagger-Rickels, David Rothlein, Courtney Guida, Carrie Hughes, Joseph DeGutis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael EstermanNational Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA. esterman@bu.edu.
Sam AgnoliBoston Attention and Learning Lab (BALLAB), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Travis C EvansNational Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Audreyana Jagger-RickelsNational Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
David RothleinNational Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Courtney GuidaBoston Attention and Learning Lab (BALLAB), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Carrie HughesNational Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Joseph DeGutisBoston Attention and Learning Lab (BALLAB), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

VA Clinical Science R&D 1I01CX002711-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the impact of emotional distraction on sustained attention using a novel gradual onset continuous performance task (gradCPT). Sustained attention is a foundational cognitive process, vulnerable to both internal (endogenous) and external (exogenous) disruptions. Reliable, validated paradigms to assess internal sources of variation in sustained attention have been used to characterize basic aspects of attention as well as individual differences and neurobiological mechanisms. However, sustained attention can also be disrupted by external distraction, especially highly salient distractors, due to their affective and/or arousing nature. Markedly less work has been conducted to develop reliable and validated paradigms to study these effects on sustained attention. This study introduces a novel task, the emogradCPT, to characterize the impact of emotional distractors (background images) on the ability to sustain attention during an emotionally neutral task (digit discrimination task). Across two experiments and three rounds of data collection, we demonstrate that emotionally negative distractors robustly and reliably disrupt ongoing ability to sustain attention, reflected in reduced accuracy, and slower RTs, relative to neutral, positive, and no distractor conditions. Further, we validated the task by correlating objective and subjective measures of distraction, as well as demonstrating the impact of these distractors on downstream memory encoding and affect. Making these data and tools publicly available, we encourage the use of this paradigm to inform future basic, clinical, and neuroimaging studies of affective interactions with ongoing goal-directed attentional processes.

Indexed as

AttentionEmotionsMemoryPsychomotor PerformanceAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultDistractionEmotionInhibitory controlMemorySustained attention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.