Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40216659›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2025

Meropenem-Vaborbactam for Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: A Narrative Review of Clinical Practice Evidence.

Matteo Bassetti, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Antonio Vena, Garyphallia Poulakou, Gian Maria Rossolini, Alex Soriano, David P Nicolau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Decoding the regulatory networks ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matteo BassettiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. matteo.bassetti@hsanmartino.it.
Daniele Roberto GiacobbeDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2385-1759
Antonio VenaDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Garyphallia Poulakou3rd Department of Internal Medicine and Laboratory, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Gian Maria RossoliniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Alex SorianoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Ciberinfect Ciber in infectious Diseases, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among drug-resistant bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a major clinical challenge with limited options for treatment. In the last several years, new treatment options have emerged for CRE, including meropenem-vaborbactam (MVB). MVB was studied clinically in the TANGO-I and TANGO-II trials, which evaluated the combination in complicated urinary tract infections and in different types of CRE infections, respectively. To date, clinical data on the efficacy of MVB in treatment of CRE remain limited, but are needed to understand the efficacy of a drug in routine practice. Eight retrospective studies have investigated the use of MVB for CRE. In these analyses, the overall clinical success rate varied from 60 to 75%, while mortality rates at 30 days ranged from about 15 to 30%. Most of these investigations involved patients with KPC-producing CRE strains, but also patients with Gram-negative infections, of which 80% were CRE. In addition, a number of small case series and case reports have emerged describing the use of MVB. In both retrospective studies and case series/reports, there appeared to be no major safety concerns. Collectively, these data have shown that MVB can be considered to have promising efficacy in severe Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing-CRE infections and is safe and well tolerated.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceKPCObservational studies

Identifiers

PMID40216659
PMCPMC12084440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.