ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Effects of postcuring times on the trueness of 3D -printed dental inlays made with permanent resins.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-curing effects on mechanical properties staining resistance of a 3D-printed resin versus a direct composite for definitive restorations.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect of Two Post-Curing Units on the Physico-Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Resins for Permanent Crown Fabrication.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Digital Restorative Dentistry: Evaluation of Clinical Outcome Parameters of CAD/CAM and 3D-Printed Inlays, Onlays, and Veneers-Scoping Review.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
- In-vitro comparison of the marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed crown restorations produced using different intraoral scanners and resin types: A Micro-CT analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparison of the Trueness of Complete Dentures Fabricated Using Liquid Crystal Display 3D Printing According to Build Angle and Natural Light Exposure.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Redefining Digital Dentistry: Multidisciplinary Applications of 3D Printing for Personalized Dental Care.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the trueness of 3D-printed dental inlays fabricated using different permanent dental resins and subjected to distinct postcuring times. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 180 inlay specimens were fabricated and divided into nine groups of 20 specimens each. The inlays were first designed using 3D design software (Ansys SpaceClaim) and then transferred to a 3D printer. Using LCD technology, 60 inlays were fabricated from Senertek P-CrownV3 Ceramic (Senertek) resin, another 60 inlays from VarseoSmile Crown Plus (Bego) resin and the final 60 inlays from Saremco Print Crowntec (Crowntec) resin. Each of these three groups was divided into three equally sized subgroups (n = 20) cured with 2,000, 4,000 and 6,000 flashes, respectively, using the Otoflash G171 device (NK Optik, Germany). Then, the specimens were scanned and digitised using an intraoral digital scanner, and their trueness was evaluated by superimposing the digital measurements on the reference design and calculating their root mean squares (RMSs) and total overlap ratios (TORs). MANOVA was used to compare the measurements, and Tukey's test was utilised for the post hoc analysis.
resultsSignificant differences in trueness were observed among the inlays fabricated with different resin types (p < 0.001). The Crowntec resin had the lowest RMS (0.08 ± 0.018 mm) and the highest TOR (94.59 ± 2.49%), indicating the best trueness, while Senertek had the highest RMS (0.114 ± 0.017 mm) and the lowest TOR (80.15 ± 5.95%), reflecting the lowest trueness. The postcuring time also significantly affected the trueness of the inlays. The 6,000-flashes group had the lowest RMS (0.095 ± 0.02 mm), and the 4000-flashes group had the highest TOR (89.81 ± 0.5%). The interaction between the resin type and the postcuring time was significant for the TOR (p = 0.01), suggesting that trueness improvements are material dependent.
conclusionBoth the resin type and the postcuring time significantly influenced the trueness of the 3D-printed dental inlay restorations. The Crowntec resin consistently exhibited superior trueness, and the Senertek resin demonstrated the lowest trueness. The optimal postcuring time varied by material, but 4,000 flashes generally provided favourable trueness outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate resin and optimising the postcuring parameters to enhance the trueness of dental inlays, potentially improving their clinical fit and longevity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Appropriate resin selection and adherence to optimised postcuring protocols are essential for achieving clinically true 3D-printed restorations, ultimately improving their adaptations in dental applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.