SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
The effectiveness of physiotherapy and rehabilitation after cervical spinal surgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo identify and characterize randomized controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of physiotherapy (PT) after cervical spine surgery in patients with degenerative spinal disease in terms of the effect of PT, and to define the treatment parameters included in the PT program and the initial period, duration, and frequency of these parameters.
methodsPubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched up to January 2024. All peer-reviewed articles, including groups of patients who received PT in the postoperative period and those who did not receive PT in this period, were reviewed for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials.
resultsA total of 1847 studies were screened, of which 10 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. All were studies comparing PT + surgery and surgery alone with either standard post-operative care or surgery alone. The PT programs included exercise therapy, cognitive behavioural therapy and optional vestibular rehabilitation. The results in the studies examined showed improvements for patients in all groups in general, and in some parameters, there was a difference in favour of the groups receiving physiotherapy. There was a high risk of bias in all 10 studies.
conclusionIn all the studies, there were drawbacks such as uncertainty of compliance with the physiotherapy (PT) program and controversial appropriateness. As these studies had a high risk of bias, it cannot be said from this literature whether physiotherapy and rehabilitation after cervical spine surgery is effective. Moreover, factors such as the type and level of surgery and pathologies varied widely in the studies included in this review. A definitive conclusion on the efficacy of PT after cervical spine surgery will be possible with more homogeneous literature and studies with a low risk of bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40216598What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.