Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40216530›Full record

Trial reportRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2026

Ultrasound guidance does not improve local anesthetic distribution in suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks in pediatric patients: a clinical, randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, crossover MRI trial.

Nergis Nina Suleiman, Ingrid Lien, Mehdi Sadat Akhavi, Davide Impieri, Kyrre Ullensvang, Jon Magnus Moen, Pernille Lindholm, Eldrid Langesæter, Axel R Sauter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05778903 (Maxillary Nerve Blocks in Children - An MRI Study of the Suprazygomatic), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05778903 naunknown statusnot on this map

Maxillary Nerve Blocks in Children - An MRI Study of the Suprazygomatic

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsNerve Block, Cleft Palate, AnalgesiaArmsNerve block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nergis Nina Suleiman *Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Lien *Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mehdi Sadat AkhaviThe Intervention Centre, Division of Technology and Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Davide ImpieriDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Kyrre UllensvangDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jon Magnus MoenDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Pernille LindholmDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eldrid LangesæterDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Axel R SauterDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway axsa@online.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-8143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaxillary nerve blocks are often used as part of a multimodal postoperative pain management regimen for children undergoing cleft palate surgery. It has not been demonstrated yet that ultrasound guidance provides superior local anesthetic distribution and better success rates compared with the landmark-based block technique. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of ultrasound guidance for suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks on local anesthetic spread to the pterygopalatine fossa.

methods20 pediatric patients scheduled for cleft palate repair received bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary blocks. Landmark technique was used on one side and ultrasound guidance on the contralateral side according to randomization. After the block procedure, MRI was used to determine the spread of the local anesthetic.

resultsLocal anesthetic spread to the pterygopalatine fossa with contact to the maxillary nerve (defined as successful block) was observed in 13 (65%) of the landmark-based blocks and in 14 (70%) of the ultrasound-guided blocks (p=0.56). No adverse events or complications were observed during or after the block procedures.

conclusionAppropriate pain management for cleft palate repair can be achieved without the availability of imaging guidance. Future studies should focus on improving the success rate of maxillary nerve blocks, both with and without the aid of sonography. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05778903.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalCleft PalateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaxillary NerveNerve BlockPediatric AnesthesiaUltrasonography, InterventionalChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSingle-Blind MethodAnesthetics, Localacute painanesthesia, localnerve blockpain managementpediatric anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40216530
PMCPMC13311958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.