Trial reportEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2025
Salbutamol for analgesia in renal colic: a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial.
Trial report in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Predicting intervention or predicting practice? Reappraising treatment pathways in renal colic.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pain of renal colic, mediated in part by ureteral spasm and inflammation, is often severe and difficult to control. Salbutamol has been shown to cause ureteral relaxation, but its effects on the pain of renal colic have never been studied. The objective of this trial was to investigate whether the use of intravenous salbutamol in addition to standard analgesia was associated with greater pain reduction compared with standard analgesia alone in patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with renal colic.
methodsThis single-centre, double-blind, phase II, randomised, placebo-controlled trial recruited adult (≥18 years) ED patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 250 µg of intravenous salbutamol or a placebo (0.9% sodium chloride). The primary outcome was the difference in the change in pain scores (measured on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale) from baseline to 30 min following trial treatment administration in participants with subsequently confirmed renal colic. A modified intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken for the primary population of participants with confirmed renal colic.
resultsConsent was obtained from 151 patients; 108 participants with confirmed renal colic were included in the primary outcome analysis. There was no statistical difference between groups in median change in pain score at 30 min (salbutamol group -18 mm (IQR -25 to -3), placebo group -13 mm (IQR -33 to -1), difference 5 mm (95% CI -16 to 6, p=0.575)). No significant differences were found in the secondary outcomes related to pain, patient satisfaction or opiate requirement.More adverse events (AEs) were observed in the salbutamol group (65) compared with placebo (42, p=0.02); no unexpected AEs were identified.
conclusionsThis trial has not identified a clinically or statistically significant benefit from the addition of intravenous salbutamol to standard care for patients presenting to an ED with pain caused by renal colic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: The trial was registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT), reference 2018-004305-11. It was also registered with the ISRCTN Registry, reference 14552440.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.