ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Prospective external validation of the automated PIPRA multivariable prediction model for postoperative delirium on real-world data from a consecutive cohort of non-cardiac surgery inpatients.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction Models for In-Hospital Delirium Using Routinely Collected Electronic Health Record Data: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Retrospective external validation of the Mayo Delirium Prediction tool in a Swiss cohort of medical and surgical inpatients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- From Emergency Department to Operating Room: The Role of Early Prehabilitation and Perioperative Care in Emergency Laparotomy: A Scoping Review and Practical Proposal.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPostoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication in surgical patients over 60, increasing morbidity, mortality and hospital stays. While international guidelines recommend risk screening, resource constraints limit implementation. This study externally validated the Pre-Interventional Preventive Risk Assessment (PIPRA) algorithm, a CE-certified tool for identifying high-risk patients to enable targeted prevention.
methodsA prospective validation study was conducted at a 335-bed Swiss hospital as part of a quality improvement initiative. Data from 866 patients aged ≥60 undergoing non-cardiac, non-intracranial surgery (May-June 2023) were analysed. The PIPRA model's performance was assessed on discrimination (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC)) and calibration.
resultsPOD occurred in 11.5% (n=100) of patients. The PIPRA model showed good discrimination (AUROC=0.77, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.82) and generally accurate calibration, though slightly overpredicting risk in high-risk patients. POD was associated with higher mortality, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stays and increased nursing care needs. The model effectively stratified patients for targeted interventions. DISCUSSION: The PIPRA algorithm demonstrated robust performance in a real-world setting, affirming its utility for POD risk prediction. The study highlighted the model's applicability across diverse clinical environments, despite differences in patient populations and screening protocols.
conclusionsThe PIPRA algorithm is a reliable tool for identifying surgical patients at risk of POD, supporting early intervention strategies to improve patient outcomes. Its integration into clinical workflows may enhance POD prevention efforts and optimise resource allocation in perioperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.