ArticleBMJ open2025
Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Women's Experiences of Psychosocial Support after Recurrent Miscarriage: A Qualitative Content Analysis.International journal of community based nursing and midwifery · 2026Article
- Recurrent Miscarriage and Infertility Services and Supports: A Qualitative Study of Views and Experiences in the Republic of Ireland.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWomen and men/partners who experience miscarriage often report poor care experiences within health services around the time of miscarriage and beyond; less is known about recurrent miscarriage (RM) care. Research is needed to explore the potential targets for improvement, in addition to identifying factors that support or hinder service improvement efforts and the implementation and/or sustainment of desired models of RM care. This study aimed to explore the views of knowledge users regarding RM services and supports; specifically: (a) practices and experiences and (b) facilitators and barriers to providing desired services and supports. STUDY
designWe adopted a qualitative study design underpinned by constructivism, incorporating semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
settingParticipants were recruited across the Republic of Ireland, incorporating perspectives from different geographical areas, hospital types and RM services.
participantsWe interviewed 13 women and 7 men/partners who had experienced ≥2 consecutive miscarriages, and 42 people involved in the delivery and/or management of RM services and supports, between June 2020 and February 2021.
resultsWe generated three themes from the data: (1) dedicated staff; (2) dedicated space and time and (3) dedicated funding and support-prioritise RM. Our analysis supports the need for a standardised, dedicated and adequately resourced and supported service. One in which people experiencing RM are offered appropriate, individualised, timely and accessible care and support-beginning following the first miscarriage, and following a graded model. Implementation requires several multilevel actions, including prioritising RM care, adequately funding and resourcing services, enhancing health professional education and support, care coordination within and between hospitals and primary care and improving public awareness of, and addressing stigma surrounding, miscarriage.
conclusionsOur analysis provides context to 'good' and 'poor' care experiences and identifies what facilitators and barriers exist to affecting change in RM care within healthcare and broader systems. In light of recent debates regarding how best to deliver RM care, and changing international guidelines, this work provides timely and important knowledge that should be harnessed to inform service improvement efforts in the Republic of Ireland and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.