ReviewBMJ global health2025
Transforming partnerships through transboundary research.
Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-adapting a school-based mental health literacy intervention for adolescents in Cambodia and Vietnam.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Collective action for responsible global health data sharing and use.BMJ global health · 2026Review
- Academic partnerships for family medicine and primary health care education: a global narrative review 7 years after Astana.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research partnerships are a key entry point for addressing the asymmetries that pervade global health. However, highly competitive and fast-paced science limits the kind of innovation and transformative change needed to reduce the imbalances that undermine the independence and academic freedom of research partners. The goal of this piece is to present a transformative lens for partnerships in which participating research organisations are willing to be mutually influenced through genuine collaborative efforts. In contrast to transactional partnerships, a transformative collaboration identifies a set of goals toward which the partnership wishes to work and agrees on the process for achieving them together. First, reflexivity and awareness of positionality are needed to recognise the power relations embedded in research and how these relations may not serve all people equally. Second, solidarity and togetherness create an interconnected view that transcends differences. Third, collective reflection on how and why the desired changes will occur is needed to guide the planning of 'who will do what, how and when' to advance equity-centred actions. Finally, shared responsibility for actions and outcomes will ensure mutual trust and a productive working relationship among partners. Implementing these principles requires some partners to relinquish control and step back when necessary, others to take ownership and greater leadership, and all partners to act with solidarity, accountability and trust. These complementary attitudes underpin the success of transformative partnerships in realising the full societal value of global health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.