ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Nanoliposomal Irinotecan as Second-Line Therapy.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of prolonged progression-free survival in patients with unresectable or recurrent pancreatic cancer treated with nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (NAPOLEON-2 study).Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionNanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) is an established second-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We previously developed a prognostic model (CGMH nomogram) to predict overall survival (OS) in patients receiving second-line chemotherapy before the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV era. Herein, we aimed to validate the CGMH nomogram in a real-world cohort treated with nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV, the current standard second-line treatment for metastatic PDAC.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 148 patients with metastatic PDAC treated with second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV was analyzed. Prognostic scores were assigned using the CGMH nomogram, with patients stratified into tertiles as good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups. Predictive performance was assessed using the concordance index (c-index) and calibration plots.ResultsOur cohort had a median OS of 6.1 months. Patients in the good, intermediate, and poor prognostic groups had median OS of 8.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-10.7), 5.7 (95% CI, 5.3-6.3), and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.8-5.2) months, respectively. Compared with the good group, intermediate and poor groups had hazard ratios of 1.99 (95% CI, 1.29-3.07,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.