ArticleACS nano2025
Arbitrary Design of DNA-Programmable 3D Crystals through Symmetry Mapping.
Article in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Directing Assembly of Mesoscale Multi-Shell Morphologies of DNA Origami Crystals.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- DNA Origami and Their Application in Biosensors.Biosensors · 2026Review
- From toroids to helical tubules: Kirigami-inspired programmable assembly of two-periodic curved crystals from DNA origami.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Inverse Thermodynamics: Designing Interactions for Targeted Phase Behavior.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Volumetric Shaping of Nanoparticle-DNA Crystals by Light-Induced Milling.Nano letters · 2025Article
- Catalytic-Assembly of Nanoparticle Supercrystals by a pH-Controlled DNA Strand-Displacement Circuit.JACS Au · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoscale self-assembly offers exciting potential for creating intricate structures beyond the limits of traditional top-down nanofabrication. Despite advancements in molecularly programmable assembly, particularly utilizing DNA nanotechnology, challenges remain in defining precise assembly instructions for the formation of complex three-dimensional (3D) superlattice architectures. DNA-based self-assembly methods offer programmability through sequence-encoded addressable bonds, but the difficulty lies in reducing the complexity and number of these interactions to establish a modular, structural design strategy and streamline the assembly and component fabrication process. This work proposes a symmetry-mapping bond assignment algorithm to guide the design of arbitrarily prescribed 3D lattices self-assembled from voxels with directional, addressable bonds and capable of carrying nanocargo. The algorithm enables the minimization of the number of DNA-based voxels, thus reducing the amount of information required to encode assembly. The developed approach leverages the symmetries of the target lattices, assembled from voxels, but significantly incorporates experimentally relevant binding rules and restrictions specific to DNA-based systems. We discuss the developed algorithm and demonstrate its capability in selected examples of nanoscale analogs of zinc blende (ZnS) and cubic Laves phase (MgCu
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.