ArticleEpidemics2025
Machine learning approaches for real-time ZIP code and county-level estimation of state-wide infectious disease hospitalizations using local health system data.
Article in Epidemics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mobility-informed metapopulation models predict the spatio-temporal spread of respiratory epidemics across scales.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lack of conventional methods of estimating real-time infectious disease burden in granular regions inhibits timely and efficient public health response. Comprehensive data sources (e.g., state health department data) typically needed for such estimation are often limited due to 1) substantial delays in data reporting and 2) lack of geographic granularity in data provided to researchers. Leveraging real-time local health system data presents an opportunity to overcome these challenges. This study evaluates the effectiveness of machine learning and statistical approaches using local health system data to estimate current and previous COVID-19 hospitalizations in South Carolina. Random Forest models demonstrated consistently higher average median percent agreement accuracy compared to generalized linear mixed models for current weekly hospitalizations across 123 ZIP codes (72.29 %, IQR: 63.20-75.62 %) and 28 counties (76.43 %, IQR: 70.33-81.16 %) with sufficient health system coverage. To account for underrepresented populations in health systems, we combined Random Forest models with Classification and Regression Trees (CART) for imputation. The average median percent agreement was 61.02 % (IQR: 51.17-72.29 %) for all ZIP codes and 72.64 % (IQR: 66.13-77.69 %) for all counties. Median percent agreement for cumulative hospitalizations over the previous 6 months was 80.98 % (IQR: 68.99-89.66 %) for all ZIP codes and 81.17 % (IQR: 68.55-91.33 %) for all counties. These findings emphasize the effectiveness of utilizing real-time health system data to estimate infectious disease burden. Moreover, the methodologies developed in this study can be adapted to estimate hospitalizations for other diseases, offering a valuable tool for public health officials to respond swiftly and effectively to various health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.