Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40215481›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

Text-Based Depression Prediction on Social Media Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Doreen Phiri, Frank Makowa, Vivi Leona Amelia, Yohane Vincent Abero Phiri, Lindelwa Portia Dlamini, Min-Huey Chung

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Doreen PhiriSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0002-6098-6564
Frank MakowaDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID 0009-0002-2689-173X
Vivi Leona AmeliaSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1312-6131
Yohane Vincent Abero PhiriDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2376-4188
Lindelwa Portia DlaminiSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7460-4817
Min-Huey ChungSchool of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0517-5913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression affects more than 350 million people globally. Traditional diagnostic methods have limitations. Analyzing textual data from social media provides new insights into predicting depression using machine learning. However, there is a lack of comprehensive reviews in this area, which necessitates further research.

objectiveThis review aims to assess the effectiveness of user-generated social media texts in predicting depression and evaluate the influence of demographic, language, social media activity, and temporal features on predicting depression on social media texts through machine learning.

methodsWe searched studies from 11 databases (CINHAL [through EBSCOhost], PubMed, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubPsych, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, IEEE Explore, and ACM digital library) from January 2008 to August 2023. We included studies that used social media texts, machine learning, and reported area under the curve, Pearson r, and specificity and sensitivity (or data used for their calculation) to predict depression. Protocol papers and studies not written in English were excluded. We extracted study characteristics, population characteristics, outcome measures, and prediction factors from each study. A random effects model was used to extract the effect sizes with 95% CIs. Study heterogeneity was evaluated using forest plots and P values in the Cochran Q test. Moderator analysis was performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity.

resultsA total of 36 studies were included. We observed a significant overall correlation between social media texts and depression, with a large effect size (r=0.630, 95% CI 0.565-0.686). We noted the same correlation and large effect size for demographic (largest effect size; r=0.642, 95% CI 0.489-0.757), social media activity (r=0.552, 95% CI 0.418-0.663), language (r=0.545, 95% CI 0.441-0.649), and temporal features (r=0.531, 95% CI 0.320-0.693). The social media platform type (public or private; P<.001), machine learning approach (shallow or deep; P=.048), and use of outcome measures (yes or no; P<.001) were significant moderators. Sensitivity analysis revealed no change in the results, indicating result stability. The Begg-Mazumdar rank correlation (Kendall τ

conclusionsSocial media textual content can be a useful tool for predicting depression. Demographics, language, social media activity, and temporal features should be considered to maximize the accuracy of depression prediction models. Additionally, the effects of social media platform type, machine learning approach, and use of outcome measures in depression prediction models need attention. Analyzing social media texts for depression prediction is challenging, and findings may not apply to a broader population. Nevertheless, our findings offer valuable insights for future research.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42023427707; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023427707.

Indexed as

DepressionMachine LearningSocial MediaHumansdepressiondepression predictionmachine learningmeta-analysissocial mediatext-based

Identifiers

PMID40215481
PMCPMC12032503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.