SynthesisJMIR medical education2025
Motivation Theories and Constructs in Experimental Studies of Online Instruction: Systematic Review and Directed Content Analysis.
Synthesis in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe motivational design of online instruction is critical in influencing learners' motivation. Given the multifaceted and situated nature of motivation, educators need access to a range of evidence-based motivational design strategies that target different motivational constructs (eg, interest or confidence).
objectiveThis systematic review and directed content analysis aimed to catalog the motivational constructs targeted in experimental studies of online motivational design strategies in health professions education. Identifying which motivational constructs have been most frequently targeted by design strategies-and which remain under-studied-can offer valuable insights into potential areas for future research.
methodsMedline, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science were searched from 1990 to August 2022. Studies were included if they compared online instructional design strategies intending to support a motivational construct (eg, interest) or motivation in general among learners in licensed health professions. Two team members independently screened and coded the studies, focusing on the motivational theories that researchers used and the motivational constructs targeted by their design strategies. Motivational constructs were coded into the following categories: intrinsic value beliefs, extrinsic value beliefs, competence and control beliefs, social connectedness, autonomy, and goals.
resultsFrom 10,584 records, 46 studies were included. Half of the studies (n=23) tested strategies aimed at making instruction more interesting, enjoyable, and fun (n=23), while fewer studies tested strategies aimed at influencing extrinsic value beliefs (n=9), competence and control beliefs (n=6), social connectedness (n=4), or autonomy (n=2). A focus on intrinsic value beliefs was particularly evident in studies not informed by a theory of motivation.
conclusionsMost research in health professions education has focused on motivating learners by making online instruction more interesting, enjoyable, and fun. We recommend that future research expand this focus to include other motivational constructs, such as relevance, confidence, and autonomy. Investigating design strategies that influence these constructs would help generate a broader toolkit of strategies for educators to support learners' motivation in online settings.
trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42022359521; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022359521.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.