ArticlePloS one2025
Improving fishing ground estimation with weak supervision and meta-learning.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating fishing grounds is an important task in the fishing industry. This study modeled the fisher's decision-making process based on sea surface temperature patterns as a pattern recognition task. We used a deep learning-based keypoint detector to estimate fishing ground locations from these patterns. However, training the model required catch data for annotation, the amount of which was limited. To address this, we proposed a training strategy that combines weak supervision and meta-learning to estimate fishing grounds. Weak supervision involves using partially annotated or noisy data, where the labels are incomplete or imprecise. In our case, catch data cover only a subset of fishing grounds, and trajectory data, which are readily available and larger in volume than catch data, provide imprecise representations of fishing grounds. Meta-learning helps the model adapt to the noise by refining its learning rate during training. Our approach involved pre-training with trajectory data and fine-tuning with catch data, with a meta-learner further mitigating label noise during pre-training. Experimental results showed that our method improved the F1-score by 64% compared to the baseline using only catch data, demonstrating the effectiveness of pre-training and meta-learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.