Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40215443›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

Endocrine Therapy Omission in Estrogen Receptor-Low (1%-10%) Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Grace M Choong, Tanya L Hoskin, Judy C Boughey, James N Ingle, Matthew P Goetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rethinking Treatment Priorities in Estrogen Receptor-Low Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grace M ChoongDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-6072
Tanya L HoskinDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-7674
Judy C BougheyDivision of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-3820-3228
James N IngleDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0003-1257-7731
Matthew P GoetzDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-4383-270X

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Fergus Joseph Couch · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improves overall survival (OS) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive early-stage breast cancer (BC). However, the benefit of ET for those with ER-low BC (ER 1%-10%) is unclear.

methodsUsing the National Cancer Database, we studied patients with high-risk stage I to III, ER-low BC (defined as immunohistochemistry 1%-10%) who received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and did or did not initiate ET. OS was analyzed with ET initiation as a time-dependent covariate using Cox proportional hazards regression.

resultsOf 10,362 patients with stage I to III ER-low BC, 7,018 received chemotherapy and met inclusion criteria. ET omission was 42% at 12 months and more common in patients with tumors that were progesterone receptor-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, higher-grade (grade 2/3) and higher Ki-67 (≥20%; all

conclusionIn ER-low, early-stage BC, ET omission is associated with significantly worse OS, especially in patients with RD after NAC and those with higher (6%-10%) ER levels. Until prospective data are available, patients with ER-low BC should be counseled regarding the potential benefit of ET.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsReceptors, EstrogenAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsReceptors, ProgesteroneAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID40215443
PMCPMC12119225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.