Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40215437›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2025

Availability and Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment Services at 19 Kenyan Health Facilities: A Brief Report.

Catherine Wexler, May Maloba, Natabhona Mabachi, Nicodemus Maosa, Shadrack Babu, Vincent S Staggs, Sharon Mokua, Kathy Goggin, Sarah Finocchario-Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catherine WexlerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0003-1891-9165
May MalobaGlobal Health Innovations-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Natabhona MabachiThe DARTNet Institute, Aurora, CO.
Nicodemus MaosaGlobal Health Innovations-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Shadrack BabuGlobal Health Innovations-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0009-0007-6055-3255
Vincent S StaggsHealth Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-6232-9149
Sharon MokuaKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-8270
Kathy GogginHealth Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.
Sarah Finocchario-KesslerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0002-7604-5606

Funding

Evaluating the HITSystem to Improve PMTCT Retention and Maternal Viral Suppression in KenyaR01MH121245 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI KESSLER, SARAH FINOCCHARIO · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Implementing and Evaluating the Cancer Tracking System (CATSystem): A systems level intervention to improve Cervical Cancer screening, treatment referral and follow up in KenyaR01CA278617 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SARAH Finocchario KESSLER, Natabhona Marianna Mabachi · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA278617NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn 2012, Kenya announced its commitment to prioritizing cervical cancer (CC) services with the National Cervical Cancer Prevention Program. However, gaps in implementation remain, causing suboptimal uptake. The goal of this study is to provide a situational analysis of 19 government health facilities in Kenya to assess facilities' capacity to provide CC screening and treatment.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective data review at 19 health facilities in Siaya and Busia counties of Kenya from September 2021 to September 2022 to assess availability and uptake of CC services. Key variables included hospital volume, positivity, and numbers of women screened, treated, and referred. Notes were taken to document challenges with service provision and data collection. The retrospective review informed site matching for a proposed cluster-randomized trial.

resultsThere were a total of 16,757 CC screenings or rescreenings documented across the 19 study sites during the study period. Across the 19 facilities, 10.8% of the women enrolled in care at the hospital were screened during the data collection period. The overall positivity was 3.8% but ranged from 0.7% to 16.7%. Of the 19 facilities offering CC screening, five lacked the required equipment to provide same-day treatment, and complex referral pathways were noted for women needing to seek care elsewhere. Challenges with documentation were noted at all stages of CC services.

conclusionGaps noted were low screening rates, opportunities to improve the efficiency of CC services, structural limitations in implementing the screen-and-treat approach, and poor documentation of CC services and outcomes. Urgent action is needed to ensure that all facilities offering CC screening are equipped with the personnel, supplies, and equipment necessary to conduct guideline-adherent same-day cryotherapy or thermal ablation treatment and improve documentation at the facility level to track CC services across the cascade of care.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansKenyaRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40215437
PMCPMC13202466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.