Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40215401›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Evaluating User Experience and Satisfaction in a Concussion Rehabilitation App: Usability Study.

Michael G Hutchison, Alex P Di Battista, Kyla L Pyndiura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael G HutchisonFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 100 Devonshire Pl, Toronto, ON, M5S 2C9, Canada, 1 416 946 5630.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-5921
Alex P Di BattistaFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 100 Devonshire Pl, Toronto, ON, M5S 2C9, Canada, 1 416 946 5630.ORCID 0000-0002-3325-6833
Kyla L PyndiuraFaculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, 100 Devonshire Pl, Toronto, ON, M5S 2C9, Canada, 1 416 946 5630.ORCID 0000-0002-3608-4109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based guidelines support the use of structured exercise to facilitate concussion recovery. Despite the growing number of mobile health (mHealth) apps aimed at managing concussions, few focus on delivering exercise rehabilitation protocols. Therefore, a mobile app was developed to provide personalized rehabilitation programs based on evidence-based exercise principles designed to cater to individuals recovering from concussions. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the usability and user experience of a mobile app designed to deliver an evidence-based rehabilitation program to individuals recovering from concussions. Methods: A two-week prospective single-arm pilot study was conducted among adults with a physician-diagnosed concussion. Participants engaged in home-based rehabilitation exercises through a mobile app. Usability was assessed using a combination of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) and five custom questions evaluating confidence in recommendations, exercise flow, clarity of voice commands, and usability of the exercise report feature. Following the two-week period, participants rated each question on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree". Results: Twenty-six participants consented and were enrolled in the study, with 23 participants (82%) completing all study components at the end of two weeks. The majority of participants were women, aged 26-38 years, and on average, approximately at three months postconcussion. Responses to both the MAUQ and custom questions were overwhelmingly positive. Overall, seven MAUQ questions received 100% positive responses, with no single question scoring below 83% positive responses. In the "ease of use and satisfaction" category, 100% of users responded positively to questions on ease of learning, usability, interface likeness, and comfort in social settings, while 83%-96% (19-22) of users responded positively to the remaining four questions. In the "system information arrangement" category, 100% (N=23) of users rated screen navigation, function usability, and health care service acceptability positively, with 87%-96% of users approving action acknowledgment, error recovery, and expected functions. Under the "usefulness" category, 96% (n=22) of users found the app beneficial for health and well-being, and 91% (n=21) users felt it effectively managed their health. For the five custom questions, 100% (N=23) users responded positively to voice command clarity, exercise awareness, ease of following exercises, and report understandability, with a single unfavorable response noted for confidence in app recommendations. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that the mobile app is a user-friendly platform for delivering evidence-based exercise rehabilitation to individuals recovering from concussions. Positive user feedback, particularly in the areas of recommendation confidence, ease of exercise flow, and clarity of voice commands, highlights the app's potential to support concussion recovery. Future iterations of the app will aim to improve time efficiency and streamline error recovery processes to further enhance the user experience.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionExercise TherapyMobile ApplicationsPatient SatisfactionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineYoung Adultappbrain injuryconcussion rehabilitationdigitaldigital healtheHealthevidence-based exercisehome-based rehabilitationmHealthmild traumatic brain injuryquestionnairerecoveryrehabilitation protocolssingle-arm pilot studysmartphonetechnologytelehealthtelemedicineusabilityuser-friendly

Identifiers

PMID40215401
PMCPMC12007725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.