Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40215365›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2025

Oxygen Supplementation in Pediatric Sedation: Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ji-Hyun Lee, Hyun Jung Ko, Jung-Bin Park, Sang-Hwan Ji, Jin-Tae Kim

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ji-Hyun LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Jung KoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Bin ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Hwan JiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Tae KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3507-9567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren undergoing moderate to deep sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are susceptible to hypoxemia because of their anatomical and physiologic features. However, optimal oxygen administration methods are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oxygen supplementation during sedation using either low-flow or high-flow nasal cannula.

methodsThis prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial included children (younger than 18 yr) undergoing moderate to deep sedation. The participants were randomly assigned to three groups as follows: (1) control (no oxygen), (2) low-flow (2 to 6 l/min oxygen via nasal cannula), and (3) high-flow (oxygen administration via high-flow nasal cannula with a flow rate of 2 l/kg and 50% fraction of inspired oxygen). The primary outcome was hypoxemia incidence (saturation of peripheral oxygen, oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry 95% or less for more than 5 s). Secondary outcomes included oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry less than 90%, rescue interventions, and sedation-related complications. Between-group differences were compared using a logistic regression model.

resultsA total of 253 participants were randomized, with 250 completing the study. Hypoxemia occurred in 27.6% of participants in the control group, 7.2% in the low-flow group, and 1.2% in the high-flow group ( P < 0.001). The odds of hypoxemia in the low-flow and high-flow groups were lower than that in the control group (odds ratio [OR], 0.184; 95% CI, 0.067 to 0.503; P = 0.001 for low-flow; OR, 0.026; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.207; P < 0.001 for high-flow). However, hypoxemia incidence of the high-flow group was not statistically lower than the low-flow group (OR, 0.143; 95% CI, 0.017 to 1.245; P = 0.078). Rescue interventions were conducted more frequently in the control group (52.9%) than in the low-flow (10.8%) and high-flow (3.6%) groups ( P < 0.001). Sedation-related complications such as desaturation and apnea were lower in the low-flow and high-flow groups than in the control group ( P < 0.001).

conclusionsRoutine oxygen supplementation prevents hypoxemia during pediatric moderate and deep sedation. Low-flow oxygen can be a reasonable choice as it effectively reduces hypoxemia while being more cost-effective and widely accessible than high-flow oxygen.

Indexed as

Deep SedationHypoxiaOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyProcedural SedationAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleOxygen SaturationProspective StudiesOxygen

Identifiers

PMID40215365
PMCPMC12147724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.