Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40215250›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Effect of caffeine citrate on diaphragmatic electrical activity in pre-term newborns.

Tatiana B B Zidan, Eduardo J Troster, Jennifer Beck, Livia R Sanches, Carlos Eduardo S Ferreira, Romy S B Zacharias, Celso M Rebello

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tatiana B B ZidanDepartamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-1920-1117
Eduardo J TrosterDepartamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jennifer BeckDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Livia R SanchesLaboratório Clínico, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo S FerreiraLaboratório Clínico, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Romy S B ZachariasDepartamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Celso M RebelloDepartamento Materno Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standard treatment for apnea of prematurity is caffeine citrate, which is known for its effect on diaphragm muscle activity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the electrical activity of the diaphragm in preterm newborns, which was measured 30 minutes before and 60 minutes after the administration of a loading dose of caffeine citrate. In this prospective, observational, longitudinal study at a tertiary-level neonatal ICU, data were collected from 36 patients (13 females, 23 males) with a mean gestational age of 31 2/7 ± 2 1/7 weeks and a mean birth weight of 1532 ± 439 grams. The average caffeine level was 15.7 ± 5.9 mg/dL (reference range: 5-30 mg/dL). The results revealed significant increases in all the parameters used to determine the inspiratory phases of the respiratory cycle postcaffeine administration (p < 0.001). The study concluded that caffeine administration significantly enhances diaphragmatic electrical activity in preterm newborns.

Indexed as

CaffeineCitratesDiaphragmInfant, PrematureApneaFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesCaffeinecaffeine citrateCitrates

Identifiers

PMID40215250
PMCPMC11990644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.