ArticlePLOS global public health2025
ALVAC-prime and monomeric gp120 protein boost induces distinct HIV-1 specific humoral and cellular responses compared with adenovirus-prime and trimeric gp140 protein boost.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1-2 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Clade C ALVAC-HIV (vCP2438) and Bivalent Subtype C gp120/MF59® in HIV-uninfected Adults at Low Risk of HIV Infection
A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 1/2a Study in Healthy HIV Uninfected Adults to Assess the Safety/Tolerability and Immunogenicity of 2 Different Prime/Boost Regimens; Priming With Trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV and Boosting With Trivalent Ad26.Mos.HIV And Clade C Gp140 Plus Adjuvant or Priming With Tetravalent Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Boosting With Tetravalent Ad26.Mos4.HIV and Clade C Gp140 Plus Adjuvant
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although clade-specific and cross-clade mosaic prime-boost HIV-1 vaccine regimens were advanced to the HVTN 702 and HVTN 705 efficacy trials, neither regimen prevented HIV acquisition. The respective Phase 1/2a studies, HVTN 100 (NCT02404311) and HVTN 117/HPX2004 (NCT02788045), provided rich immunological data, including previously identified correlates of risk, for comparing immune responses elicited by these vaccine regimens over time. We analyzed antibody responses measured by binding antibody multiplex assay, and CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses measured by intracellular cytokine staining in per-protocol vaccinees in HVTN 100 (n=186) vs. HVTN 117/HPX2004 (n=99) after the months 6 and 12 vaccinations (months 6.5/7 and 12.5/13), and 6 months after the last vaccination (month 18). At month 12.5/13, both regimens induced similarly high IgG breadth against gp120, gp140, and V1V2 antigens, and similar IgG responses to gp70-BCaseA V1V2. IgG V1V2 responses were more durable in HVTN 117/HPX2004, with the largest difference in the gp70-BCaseA V1V2 IgG response rate at month 18 (17.8% in HVTN 100 vs 61.9% in HVTN 117/HPX2004, p<0.001). IgG3 responses to consensus Env antigens were higher and more durable in HVTN117/HPX2004; for example, IgG3 response rate to the consensus gp140 antigen was 65.9% in HVTN 117/HPX2004 vs 6.3% in HVTN 100 at month 18 (TMLE p<0.0001). At month 18, both regimens induced similar IgG3 responses to gp70-BCaseA V1V2 (3.2% in HVTN 100 vs 1.1% in HVTN 117/HPX2004). Polyfunctional CD4+ Env was significantly higher in HVTN 100, and polyfunctional CD4+ Gag was higher in HVTN 117/HPX2004. CD8+ T-cell responses were not seen in HVTN 100, while CD8+ T-cell response rates in HVTN 117/HPX2004 reached up to 42%. Despite the distinct immune responses induced by the two HIV vaccine regimens, the lack of demonstrated efficacy suggests that broader, higher magnitude, and possibly qualitatively different immune responses are needed for protection against HIV acquisition. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02404311 and NCT02788045; South African National Clinical Trials Registry (DOH-27-0215-4796).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.