ReviewInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2025
Surgical strategies for mitral valve diseases associated with pectus excavatum: a narrative review of approaches and outcomes.
Review in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a decision-making framework for the surgical management of coexisting mitral valve (MV) prolapse and pectus excavatum, addressing the challenges posed by anatomical complexity and functional compromise.
methodsA narrative review of reported cases involving coexisting MV prolapse and pectus excavatum was conducted. Each case was analysed to evaluate the characteristics, personalized surgical strategies and operational details, with a focus on the associated benefits and risks. Additionally, surgical strategies were classified, and process management approaches were explored to guide treatment planning.
resultsThe management of coexisting MV prolapse and pectus excavatum was categorized into three tailored approaches: (i) isolated chest wall reconstruction for cardiac decompression in patients with preserved valvular function; (ii) standalone MV repair or replacement for severe regurgitation with mild-to-moderate skeletal deformity (Haller index <3.5) and (iii) single-stage combined procedures for complex presentations (Haller index ≥3.5). A framework for personalized treatment pathways was proposed, incorporating factors such as deformity severity, surgical history and haemodynamic status to optimize approach selection.
conclusionsThe integration of innovative surgical techniques and minimally invasive approaches offers the potential for safe and effective outcomes. A personalized, anatomically stratified approach is essential for optimizing treatment strategies in patients with this complex comorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.