Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40215089›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal care2025

Australian General Practitioners' Use of Diagnostic Lumbar Spine Imaging for Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Qualitative Study.

Tomas Rozbroj, Benjamin Reed, Denise A O'Connor, Nicholas Gelber, Allison Bourne, Chris G Maher, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tomas RozbrojSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3084-746X
Benjamin ReedRoyal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3678-089X
Denise A O'ConnorSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6836-122X
Nicholas GelberSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Allison BourneSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6454-8214
Chris G MaherSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-7857
Rachelle BuchbinderSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-0933

Funding

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Fellowship APP1194483Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Fellowship APP2025661MRFF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) use of imaging for acute low back pain (LBP) is above guideline recommendations, and the reasons for this remain under-researched. We examined the perspectives, expectations and information needs of Australian GPs requesting lumbar spine diagnostic imaging for patients presenting with acute LBP.

methodsWe completed semi-structured interviews with 12 GPs practising in Victoria, Australia. Transcripts were thematically analysed, and themes compared according to whether or not GPs reported they regularly requested imaging for LBP.

resultsWe identified four themes. (1) Besides responding to 'red flags', GPs' experiences of uncovering unexpected but serious findings on imaging for LBP as well as perceived external pressures motivated their defensive imaging practices. (2) While most were reluctant to request imaging for LBP, once requested, GPs escalated through imaging modalities and focused on the diagnostic benefit of their findings. (3) GPs supported the inclusion of epidemiological data on imaging reports, but (4) largely opposed imaging reports being written in plain language, believing reports to be clinician-to-clinician communications that patients would misunderstand. All GPs were aware of the limited utility of imaging for diagnosing LBP, and themes were similar between GPs who regularly requested imaging and those who did not. Factors other than knowledge of imaging efficacy for LBP seemed to play an important role in imaging requests.

conclusionsOur study identified key drivers of imaging use for LBP in primary care. The findings underscore that interventions targeting GPs addressing the overuse of imaging for LBP should transcend knowledge deficit models.

Indexed as

General PractitionersLow Back PainLumbar VertebraePractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchVictoriaAustraliadiagnostic imaginggeneral practicelow back painoverdiagnosisradiolog* report*

Identifiers

PMID40215089
PMCPMC11989193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.