Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40215071›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Quantifying Indirect Billing Within the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

John F Mulcahy, Sadiq Y Patel, Ateev Mehrotra, Hannah T Neprash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John F MulcahyDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
Sadiq Y PatelClinical Product Development, Waymark, San Francisco, California.
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Hannah T NeprashDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R03 HS028490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Under certain circumstances, advance practice clinicians (APCs), such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners, can bill Medicare directly or indirectly (ie, incident to the services of a physician). With indirect billing, the submitted claim states the care was provided by the physician, and the reimbursement is higher. Objective: To quantify volume and spending on office-based encounters billed indirectly in the Medicare program. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used Medicare fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage claims data to identify indirectly billed APC services. To do so, office-based Medicare Part B claims (ie, clinician services) were linked to Part D claims for prescription drug fills. Because the latter contains the prescribing clinician's unique identifier, this linkage distinguished between directly and indirectly billed services provided by APCs. In this way, the fraction of encounters and component services billed indirectly by APCs and physicians were quantified. Main Outcomes and Measures: Share of fee-for-service and Medicare Advantage office encounters provided by APCs and billed indirectly. Share of a physician's billed claims actually provided by an APC and billed indirectly. Results: In 2022, of all office encounters provided by an APC, 38.9% were billed indirectly. Conversely, for the median physician in 2022, indirect billing on behalf of APCs represented 11.1% of all billed encounters. Billing for care delivered by APCs was most common among surgical specialists (29.7% of encounters) and least common for primary care physicians (3.9%). If all indirectly billed APC-provided care was billed directly by the APC, Medicare would have saved $270 million in 2022. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that APCs provide a substantial fraction of office-based care received by Medicare beneficiaries. Identifying indirectly billed APC-provided care is integral to understanding who serves Medicare beneficiaries.

Indexed as

Fee-for-Service PlansFee SchedulesMedicarePhysiciansAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40215071
PMCPMC11992606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.