ReviewThe Journal of physiology2025
Stem cell approaches for tendon repair: delusion or insight.
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tendon injuries are a common and significant health burden around the world. Current treatment strategies are unable to fully restore tendon structure and function. To address these critical clinical needs, stem cell therapy has recently emerged as a promising approach for better tendon repair. In this review, we discuss treatment efficacy of stem cell therapy in tendon repair by summarizing its advantages and disadvantages in both the preclinical and clinical settings. We highlight recent advances in improving stem cell-based treatment, with a focus on research efforts in identification of appropriate cell sources, cell modification for effective transplantation, development of appropriate cell carriers, and standardization of treatment protocols. Finally, we provide insights into future directions for stem cell therapy, with emphasis on the necessity of employing effective patient screening criteria before treatment and establishing comprehensive outcome measurements to ensure rigor and efficacy in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.