ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2025
Person-Centred Care: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A person-centred care intervention provided via eHealth to reduce fatigue in patients with common mental disorders - secondary outcome analysis from a randomized controlled trial.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of a Remote Person-Centered Intervention Using an eHealth Platform and Telephone Support for Persons With Chronic Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Remote person-centred care and long-term medication management in primary care: post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2026Trial
- Group-based trajectory modelling of multiple health outcomes in a cost-consequence framework: a randomized controlled trial of a remote person-centred care intervention for people with common mental disorders in Sweden.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Trial
- Reducing tokenism in patient and public involvement by integrating the Gothenburg person-centred care framework, relational bridges and impact log - a co-produced position paper.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Invisible Agency in the Search for Healing: Patient and Family Roles in the Care of Hard-to-Heal Wounds in Primary Healthcare.International wound journal · 2026Article
- The role of job satisfaction on the association between perceived person-centred care and stress of conscience: a moderated mediation analysis of cross-sectional data from primary care professionals.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- The importance of partnership in chronic pain - co-creation of tomorrow's pain care by working together in research, implementation, and knowledge dissemination.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Person-Centred Nursing in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Using a Conversation Tool: A Qualitative Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMany countries prioritise the implementation of person-centred care. This study examines the progression of research in person-centred care, specifically focusing on using complex interventions within intricate contexts. It aims to explore how previous experiences can inform and shape subsequent projects. The review was based on five studies from our research group, encompassing 1099 patients, resulting in 41 peer-reviewed scientific publications. Most studies focused on patients suffering from chronic heart failure, as well as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Additionally, interventions for acute coronary syndrome and common mental disorders were also considered. Analyses included the development of a logical model for person-centred care, an overview of partnership operationalisation, and the establishment of evaluation criteria for the trials. The analyses involved creating a coherent model for person-centred care, examining partnership operationalisation, and establishing trial evaluation criteria. RECENT
findingsSequential trials build upon their predecessors and add new elements. The studies conducted by clinicians in usual care and in-house by research staff were complementary, providing a deeper understanding of the efficacy and effectiveness of person-centred care. Initiating, working, and safeguarding a partnership between patient and staff was possible, whether through in-person or remote communication. Evaluations followed modern research standards and incorporated past study insights for a more thorough approach. This study highlights how the cumulative experience from previous research in person-centred care informs the design and analyses of subsequent projects through an iterative learning process, particularly important for complex interventions in various health care contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.