Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214949›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2025

Person-Centred Care: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.

Hanna Gyllensten, Matilda Cederberg, Sara Alsén, Elin Blanck, Lilas Ali, Andreas Fors, Håkan Hedman, Laura Pirhonen Nørmark, Karl Swedberg, Inger Ekman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hanna GyllenstenInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.gyllensten@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-5162
Matilda CederbergInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4727-9638
Sara AlsénInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-3656
Elin BlanckInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-2552
Lilas AliInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7027-4371
Andreas ForsInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8980-0538
Håkan HedmanCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Laura Pirhonen NørmarkInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7371-2215
Karl SwedbergCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6358-2154
Inger EkmanInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5559-5203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMany countries prioritise the implementation of person-centred care. This study examines the progression of research in person-centred care, specifically focusing on using complex interventions within intricate contexts. It aims to explore how previous experiences can inform and shape subsequent projects. The review was based on five studies from our research group, encompassing 1099 patients, resulting in 41 peer-reviewed scientific publications. Most studies focused on patients suffering from chronic heart failure, as well as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Additionally, interventions for acute coronary syndrome and common mental disorders were also considered. Analyses included the development of a logical model for person-centred care, an overview of partnership operationalisation, and the establishment of evaluation criteria for the trials. The analyses involved creating a coherent model for person-centred care, examining partnership operationalisation, and establishing trial evaluation criteria. RECENT

findingsSequential trials build upon their predecessors and add new elements. The studies conducted by clinicians in usual care and in-house by research staff were complementary, providing a deeper understanding of the efficacy and effectiveness of person-centred care. Initiating, working, and safeguarding a partnership between patient and staff was possible, whether through in-person or remote communication. Evaluations followed modern research standards and incorporated past study insights for a more thorough approach. This study highlights how the cumulative experience from previous research in person-centred care informs the design and analyses of subsequent projects through an iterative learning process, particularly important for complex interventions in various health care contexts.

Indexed as

Heart FailurePatient-Centered CareHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAcute coronary syndromeChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCommon mental disordersHeart failurePerson-centred carePulmonary disease

Identifiers

PMID40214949
PMCPMC11991961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.