Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214914›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2025

Rare pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma variants and other malignant epithelial tumors: a comprehensive clinical and radiologic review.

Yukihisa Takayama, Ryo Murayama, Shinji Tanaka, Keisuke Sato, Kazuki Goto, Gaku Honda, Kengo Yoshimitsu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Imaging of pancreatic hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a scoping review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adult-Onset Pancreatoblastoma.ACG case reports journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yukihisa TakayamaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan. ytakayama@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-9316
Ryo MurayamaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Shinji TanakaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Keisuke SatoDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Kazuki GotoDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Gaku HondaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Kengo YoshimitsuDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 95% of pancreatic carcinomas are classified as conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (cPDAC), while less than 5% consist of rare histological subtypes. Some of these rare histological subtypes, such as colloid carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells, are associated with a relatively better prognosis compared to cPDAC, whereas others, including signet ring cell carcinoma/poorly cohesive carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, large cell carcinoma with rhabdoid phenotype, and undifferentiated carcinoma, have a worse prognosis. Other malignant pancreatic epithelial tumors (MPET) include acinar cell carcinoma, pancreatoblastoma, and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm that should also be differentiate from PDACs. Accurate differentiation among PDAC subtypes and other MPETs is essential for precise survival predictions and effective therapeutic planning. However, cPDAC, rare histological subtypes of PDAC and MPETs often exhibit similar imaging findings, making it challenging to establish a diagnosis based solely on imaging. Thus, needle biopsy or surgical resection is generally required for the final diagnosis. We herein present a review article based on case studies and literature reviews of rare histological subtypes of PDAC and other MPET, with particular focus on their imaging characteristics, referencing the 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPancreas1⁸F-FDG-PETCTMRIPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaRadiological featuresRare histologic subtype

Identifiers

PMID40214914
PMCPMC12287246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.