Trial reportCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2025
Effects of the head-elevated position on cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation with manual in-line stabilization: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe head-elevated position during videolaryngoscopic intubation enables better visualization of the glottis than the head-flat position. We hypothesized that the head-elevated position would result in less cervical spine motion during videolaryngoscopic intubation under manual in-line stabilization.
methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial in which we assigned patients undergoing coil embolization for unruptured cerebral aneurysms into the head-elevated (N = 55) or head-flat (N = 54) groups. Manual in-line stabilization was applied to simulate cervical spine immobilization during Macintosh-type videolaryngoscopic intubation. To measure the cervical spine angle, two lateral cervical spine radiographs using the capture method were taken, one before and one during intubation, respectively. The primary outcome was cervical spine motion during intubation (cervical spine angle during intubation - cervical spine angle before intubation) at the occiput-C1 segment. We investigated cervical spine motion at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments; intubation performance, such as the success rate at the first attempt, intubation time, and frequency of external laryngeal maneuver; and intubation-associated airway complications (airway bleeding, injury, sore throat, and hoarseness).
resultsThere was significantly less cervical spine motion at the occiput-C1 segment in the head-elevated group than the head-flat group (mean [standard deviation], 8.6° [5.6°] vs 11.4° [5.7°]; mean difference [95% confidence interval], -2.9° [-5.0 to -0.7]; P = 0.009). Cervical spine motion at the C1-C2 and C2-C5 segments, intubation performance, and intubation-associated airway complications did not significantly differ between the groups.
conclusionsThe head-elevated position during Macintosh-type videolaryngoscopic intubation with manual in-line stabilization resulted in less upper cervical spine motion than the head-flat position. STUDY REGISTRATION: CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0008669 ); date of registration (approved), 1 August 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214868What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.