Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40214859›Full record

ArticleHuman cell2025

In vitro properties of four benign meningioma cells derived from WHO grade 1 meningiomas.

Thanawat Trasaktaweesakul, Pundit Asavaritikrai, Krajang Talabnin, Dusit Kongnawakul, Sukanya Tastub, Pitchanun Jaturutthaweechot, Nopporn Naewwan, Chutima Talabnin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thanawat TrasaktaweesakulSchool of Translational Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Pundit AsavaritikraiSchool of Surgery, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand. pundit@sut.ac.th.
Krajang TalabninSchool of Translational Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Dusit KongnawakulSchool of Pathology, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Sukanya TastubSynchrotron Light Research Institute, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Pitchanun JaturutthaweechotSchool of Chemistry, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Nopporn NaewwanSchool of Translational Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
Chutima TalabninSchool of Translational Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand. chutima.sub@sut.ac.th.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9064-2362

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand N41A670301National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund 179281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors arising from the meninges. They exhibit heterogeneity in their biological behaviors and clinical outcomes. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of meningioma development and progression using in vitro systems is essential for improved diagnosis and targeted therapeutic strategies. In this study, four primary meningioma cells designated as SUT-MG9, SUT-MG12, SUT-MG14, and SUT-MG16 were established from WHO grade 1 meningioma tissues via a primary cell culture technique. The phenotypic and genetic characteristics of the four primary meningioma cells were determined. Four primary meningioma cells presented a spindle-shaped morphology with large nuclei and showed prominent expression of meningioma markers, including somatostatin receptor 2 A and vimentin. Growth characteristics demonstrated that SUT-MG9, SUT-MG12, and SUT-MG14 were fast growing, whereas SUT-MG16 was slow growing. Additionally, the expression levels of relevant genes in cell stemness (SOX2, Nanog, and BMI1) and cell cycle (CDK4, CCND1, and CCNB1) were detected only in SUT-MG12 and SUT-MG14. Interestingly, chemosensitivity assay showed that primary benign meningioma cells were less sensitive to gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil. Moreover, biochemical profiles revealed high lipid and ester contents, but low nucleic acid contents in all primary meningioma cells compared to malignant meningioma cell lines. In conclusion, the four primary meningioma cells can serve as cell models for further meningioma development and drug treatment studies.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaBiomarkers, TumorCell CycleCell ProliferationCyclin B1Cyclin D1Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4DeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansMiddle AgedNanog Homeobox ProteinNeoplasm GradingBiomarkers, TumorBMI1 protein, humanCCND1 protein, humanCDK4 protein, humanCyclin B1Cyclin D1Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4DeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineNanog Homeobox ProteinPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Receptors, SomatostatinSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription FactorsVimentinBenignCell growthCell stemnessMeningiomasPrimary culture

Identifiers

PMID40214859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.