ArticleHuman cell2025
In vitro properties of four benign meningioma cells derived from WHO grade 1 meningiomas.
Article in Human cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling meningioma in vitro in the omics era.Human cell · 2026Review
- Growth pattern and molecular biological analysis of primary meningioma cell cultures under different conditions.Molecular medicine reports · 2026Article
- Enzalutamide effectively inhibits the growth of meningiomas via p21-dependent senescence induction.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Piperlongumine induces meningioma cell death via the ROS-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress and the alteration of the ubiquitin-proteasome system.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors arising from the meninges. They exhibit heterogeneity in their biological behaviors and clinical outcomes. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of meningioma development and progression using in vitro systems is essential for improved diagnosis and targeted therapeutic strategies. In this study, four primary meningioma cells designated as SUT-MG9, SUT-MG12, SUT-MG14, and SUT-MG16 were established from WHO grade 1 meningioma tissues via a primary cell culture technique. The phenotypic and genetic characteristics of the four primary meningioma cells were determined. Four primary meningioma cells presented a spindle-shaped morphology with large nuclei and showed prominent expression of meningioma markers, including somatostatin receptor 2 A and vimentin. Growth characteristics demonstrated that SUT-MG9, SUT-MG12, and SUT-MG14 were fast growing, whereas SUT-MG16 was slow growing. Additionally, the expression levels of relevant genes in cell stemness (SOX2, Nanog, and BMI1) and cell cycle (CDK4, CCND1, and CCNB1) were detected only in SUT-MG12 and SUT-MG14. Interestingly, chemosensitivity assay showed that primary benign meningioma cells were less sensitive to gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil. Moreover, biochemical profiles revealed high lipid and ester contents, but low nucleic acid contents in all primary meningioma cells compared to malignant meningioma cell lines. In conclusion, the four primary meningioma cells can serve as cell models for further meningioma development and drug treatment studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214859What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.