ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025
Energy-based device innovations including laser and non-laser therapies in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing Unmet Needs in Hidradenitis Suppurativa by Including the Hair Follicle Among an Arsenal of Targets.Experimental dermatology · 2026Review
- Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Dye Laser, Intense Pulsed Light and Radiofrequency Therapy in the Treatment of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Regenerative Potential of Various Plant-Derived Exosome Injections in Laser-Induced Skin Wound Healing in a Rabbit Model.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
- Oxidative Stress, High Density Lipoproteins and Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Prospective Study.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that is often difficult to treat. When initial medical treatments fail, surgical interventions, including laser and non-laser procedures, may be considered. This review examines recent studies investigating the effectiveness of these procedures, focusing on publications since March 2019. The review included English-language case reports, studies, and clinical trials sourced from PubMed using search terms such as "hidradenitis suppurativa," "Nd: YAG," "photodynamic therapy," "intense pulsed light," "alexandrite," "diode," "CO2," "radiofrequency," "ablative," "fractionated," "laser," and "hair removal." Review articles and animal studies were excluded. The review found strong evidence supporting the use of Nd: YAG and CO2 lasers for reducing inflammatory lesions and excising sinus tracts. Alexandrite lasers also showed promise, with 50% of treated patients achieving a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at 15 weeks, increasing to 70% by week 30. Fractional radiofrequency (RF) microneedling and radiofrequency-intense pulsed light (RF-IPL) combinations led to reduced inflammation and improved tissue remodeling by weeks 6 and 24, respectively. Both intralesional and traditional photodynamic therapy (PDT) approaches demonstrated efficacy in reducing lesion size and associated symptoms. In conclusion, various laser and non-laser energy-based therapies show promise for managing HS, particularly in cases refractory to conventional treatments. Further research with robust study designs is warranted to optimize treatment protocols and establish long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40214814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.